Reviewer Brent Ward
Manufacturer Alesis
Model Nano Compressor
Price $150 Canadian

Controls Theshold, Ratio, Attack, Release, Output
Options Soft or Hard Knee, Compression Bypass, Stereo Output
Weight 2 lbs tops
Size 1/3 rack

I tried out a DBX 163A and this NanoCompressor using a bass guitar. I found the NanoCompressor to beat the DBX 163A because it gives more flexibility in the type of compression you can get out of it. The DBX 163A seemed to have preset attack and release, which I couldn't influence, and a pre-set threshold. All of these things can be adjusted the way you want on the Nanocompressor.

The output pot on the 163A was also hard to operate because it lays almost flat, while all the controls on the nanocompressor are traditional, deep dials that are easy to adjust quickly and precisely.

The 163A requires you to disconnect it from your bass if you want to play without compression, while the Nanocompressor allows you bypass the compressor while still plugged into it by pushing a button.

The nano compresor can also be used in the studio to compress the final mix in stereo, while the DBX160A is strictly mono, I was told.

My only criticism is that the maximum release time is only 3 seconds. This means held notes tend to swell, particularly if you're using a low threshold and high ratio. I would have preferred to have a longer threshold so all the compressor does is compress the sound, not create volume swells.

Overall, this unit was the best one I could find for the money given the great flexibility it gives you in creating the type of compression you want. It is far superior to it's competitor, the DBX 160A.


Quality 80%
Perormance 100%
Appearance 90%
Useability 100%
Value 90%
Overall 90%

This page is part of the BGRA
All rights reserved.