Reviewer Chuck McLaughlin
Manufacturer Rickenbacker
Model 4001
Price @ $1000

Neck Type Laminated maple/walnut, neck-though-body.
Fingerboard Rosewood, varnished, bound, sparkle triangular markers.
Body Type Maple wings w/white body binding.
Finish Transparent dark red.
Pickup(s) 2 single-coil (passive).
Controls Volume/tone for each pickup, toggle pickup selector switch, mono
and stereo (Rick-O-Sound!) output jacks.

The Rickenbacker 4001/4003 is a truly classic bass. It's been around for almost 40 years now with few changes, and it's famous users include Paul McCartney, Chris Squire, Geddy Lee, John Entwhistle, and many others. The Rick is one of the few high quality, American made basses still available in the $1000 range new. The workmanship is excellent and the design is very unique. The neck is wide but slim front-to-back, and is very fast. The dual truss rods in the 4001 require a special wrench and are a pain to adjust (this was improved on the 4003 model, which replaced the 4001 in the early '80s).

Aside from its weird "cresting wave" shape, the most unusual thing about the Rick is it's tone. Most people either love it or hate it. It is the antithesis of the Fender P-bass sound; all lows and highs with a very thin midrange (I can't understand how McCartney got those rich midrangey tones from his 4001, must have been lots of studio eq). This makes the Rick great for funk, rock & metal, not so good for country or blues. Many consider it hard to slap due to it's low string clearance and neck pickup location.

The Rick has plenty of quirks (to be expected in a 40-year-old design) including a pain-in-the-neck bridge, reversed tone and volume control positions, and an over-the-strings pickup cover that most players immediately remove. Other odd features include a built-in foam rubber mute and "Rick-O-Sound" stereo jack, which requires a special cable to use. All in all, I really like the Rick. It's fun to play and has a truly unique sound. However, I coundn't see having it as my only bass due to it's limited tonal range.


Construction 90%
Playability 85%
Appearance 100%
(eye of the beholder)
Sound (maybe) 20%
Maybe 80%
(depends on music played)
Value 95%
Overall 90%

This page is part of the BGRA
All rights reserved.